Make informed typography decisions with our comprehensive side-by-side comparison of Arabic fonts. Analyze features, readability, performance, and use cases to find the perfect font for your project.
Legibility across different sizes and contexts
Loading speed and rendering quality
Best applications and contexts
Technical capabilities and OpenType features
The classic debate in Arabic typography: modern functionality versus traditional elegance. Here's how the two most popular fonts in each category compare across key metrics.
| Feature | Cairo (Modern) | Amiri (Traditional) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Readability | Excellent | Good | Cairo |
| Cultural Authenticity | Good | Excellent | Amiri |
| Web Performance | Excellent | Good | Cairo |
| Formal Documents | Good | Excellent | Amiri |
| Modern UI/UX | Excellent | Poor | Cairo |
| File Size | Small | Medium | Cairo |
For technology companies and startups, the choice of Arabic font can significantly impact user experience and brand perception. Here's how the top contenders compare for tech applications.
Best for: Fintech apps, modern websites, tech startups
Best for: Mobile apps, dashboards, SaaS platforms
Best for: Content platforms, e-commerce, general web use
Technical performance can make or break user experience, especially in web and mobile applications. Here's how popular Arabic fonts compare on key technical metrics.
| Font | File Size | Load Time | Rendering | Mobile | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cairo | 45KB | Fast | Excellent | Optimized | A+ |
| Tajawal | 52KB | Fast | Excellent | Good | A |
| Amiri | 180KB | Medium | Excellent | Fair | B+ |
| Mada | 58KB | Fast | Good | Excellent | A |
| Lateef | 95KB | Medium | Good | Good | B+ |
Choose the right font for your specific use case with this comprehensive decision matrix. Each scenario is rated based on font suitability and real-world performance.